Abstract:
هدف: مطالعات علمسنجی از مهجورشدن دانش کاربردی، رشد نامتوازن حوزههای علم و تولید پژوهشهای تکراری جلوگیری میکند. سیاستگذاری رسانهای یکی از حوزههای موضوعی رشته مدیریت رسانه است. آگاهی از پژوهشهای انجام شده در این حوزه، قدرت پیشبینی آینده این پژوهشها و چگونگی تأثیرگذاری آن بر سیاستگذاریهای صنعت رسانه را تسهیل میکند. از این رو، هدف مطالعه حاضر ترسیم نقشه علم بر اساسِ مقالههای منتشر شده در حوزه سیاستگذاری رسانهای بوده است.روش: پژوهش حاضر با استفاده از فنون تحلیل شبکه اجتماعی و تحلیل خوشه انجام شده است. گردآوری دادهها بهصورت جستوجوی موضوعی در عنوان مقالهها با 5 کلیدواژه مرتبط با سیاستگذاری رسانه، یعنی آزادی بیان، کپیرایت، حریم خصوصی، محافظت از دادهها و بیطرفی شبکه، انجام شد. جامعه پژوهش، تمام مقالههایی است که در حوزه سیاستگذاری رسانهای نگاشته شده و بین سالهای 2000 تا 2019 در پایگاه علوم (Web of Science) نمایه شده است که بارگیری و ذخیره رکوردهای یادشده، در مجموع 900 مقاله انجامید. برای پاسخ به سؤالهای پژوهش، از تکنیک خوشهبندی و مصورسازی و همچنین نسخه 1.6.13 نرمافزار Vos Viewer استفاده شد.یافتهها: بیشترین تعداد مقالههای مرتبط با سیاستگذاری رسانه در سال 2018 با 112 مقاله منتشر شده و بیشترین میزان استناد در سال 2017 با 630 استناد بوده است. تعداد کل نویسندگان در این شبکه استنادی 1873 نفر است که از این تعداد، 119 نویسنده در قالب گره، در نقشه همتألیفی سیاستگذاری رسانهای حضور دارند. در این پژوهش سیر تکامل شبکه همرخدادی کلمات کلیدی و شبکه همکاری نویسندگان در سالهای 2000 تا 2019 در چهار دوره زمانی برای پایان سال 2004، 2009، 2014 و 2019 ترسیم شده است. همچنین شبکه همکاری نویسندگان مابین دانشگاههای کشورهای مختلف همراه با انطباق بر نقشه جهانی و پراکندگی جغرافیایی نیز مشخص شد.نتیجهگیری: بررسی نقشههای علم، ضرورت توجه به موضوعات و روندهای رو به رشد در هر حوزه علمی را نمایان میسازد. نقشه علم ارائه شده در این پژوهش نیز توجه به موضوع حریم خصوصی در پژوهشهای این حوزه را نشان میدهد که با روند رو به رشد درخواست کاربران پلتفرمهای رسانههای اجتماعی در این رابطه همگراست.
ObjectiveBibliometric studies prevent the abandonment of knowledge, the unbalanced growth of science fields, and the production of duplicate research. Media policy is one of the important fields of media management. Media policy is concerned with the media industry regulating activities to protect and develop the interests of stakeholders, and to control the power in this industry (Labafi & Williams, 2019). Media policy determines and affects how media industries develop (Doyle, 2013). Media policy is a product of national political, cultural, and social ideologies (Ots and Krumsvik, 2016; Freedman, 2008; Freedman, 2018; Labafi et al., 2020). It helps to achieve specific goals of the governing system (Hutchison, 1999), retain and attract stakeholders, and control power in the industry (Labafi et al., 2019). Some scholars accept the state intervention at a minimum level (Evans, 2016) and suppose that various players such as states, civil institutions, and users should take part in policy-making (Puppis, 2010). However, it depends on a specific context. Regarding either national or international legislation systems, previous studies (Van Cuilenburg and McQuail, 2003; Lund, 2004; Freedman, 2011) indicate that media policy requires a series of socially accepted principles. Up until now, the studies in the field of media policy followed a variety of approaches, and the diversity of its studies in each period was proportionate to the media industry regulation needs (Van Den Bulck et al., 2019). Awareness of the studies on this field facilitates predicting the future of these studies and their influence on policy-making in the media industry. No research has been carried out neither on the status of scientific products of media policy nor on the growth pattern of these products based on the indices of network and cluster analysis. Bibliometric studies can provide an effective tool to prevent the marginalization of applied knowledge, unbalanced growth of some fields of science, and conduction of duplicate studies. This paper reviewed and analyzed the studies conducted in this field using network and cluster analysis. It is seeking to draw a Bibliometric map following the papers published in the field of media policy. Research MethodologyThis research was carried out using network analysis techniques, as well as cluster analysis. The data collection entails the search of paper titles comprising five keywords related to media policy (freedom of speech, copyright, privacy, data protection, and net neutrality). The research population included all papers on the Web of Science in the field of media policy from 2000 to 2019. The aforesaid records were downloaded and stored (a total of 900 were stored and processed). The clustering and visualization techniques were used by Vos Viewer, 1.6.13 to respond to the research questions. FindingsThe findings suggested that the majority of the papers were carried out in 2018, i.e., 112 papers, and the highest number of citations amounted to 630 in 2017. A total number of 1873 authors were studied in this citation network, which included 119 authors as nodes in the co-authorship network map of media policy. In this research, the evolution of keywords’ co-occurrence and authors’ collaboration networks were drawn from 2000 to 2019 in the four-time intervals of the end of 2004, 2009, 2014, and 2019. The most repeated concepts in the papers were social media, media policymaking, privacy, information security, regulation, politics, Facebook, etc. The most repeated and co-occurred concepts were classified into 5 clusters. The most important cluster consisted of concepts related to social medial regulation; in this cluster, concepts such as Web-2, information privacy, Twitter, Facebook, security, copyright, impact, new media, data protection, trust, and policy co-occurred more than 4 times. In addition, the authors’ collaboration network among the universities of different countries was specified together with adjustments on the world map and geographical dispersion. The co-authorship map of media policymaking includes 119 nodes. Considering the novelty and interdisciplinary nature of this field, there is no large network of cooperation, and authors are usually willing to write and publish their works individually or less cooperate with those in this network. Figures such as Philip Napoli, Des Freedman, and Petros Iosifidis have published several works individually without cooperation or through minimum cooperation with those in this network. The largest co-authorship network in this map consists of 12 authors, such as Paola Mancini, Carlo, and Bellini. Discussion & ConclusionThe Bibliometric maps demonstrated the necessity of considering the growing themes and trends in a scientific field. The Bibliometric mapping of Media Policy proposed in this research indicated the emphasis on privacy in the studies in this field, which is convergent with the requests of the social media users in this regard. Furthermore, the co-occurrence of keywords suggested that researchers are more inclined to work on the big data and media platforms at their disposal and seek to conceptualize the ownership of these data using various approaches. The media industry policymakers are recommended to seriously consider the most repeated concepts of papers because these abstract concepts will turn into real needs of the industry and users in the future. Events such as the Cambridge Analytica scandal well indicated that the media industry needs to come up with new policies to deal with changes. The public discourse now demands the regulation of media platforms; the demands in this regard cover a wide range from the necessity of monitoring media platforms to the need for media platforms to be accountable for user-generated content. The diversity and multiplicity of studies on media policymaking can help policymakers to develop and implement better policies.
Machine summary:
از اين رو، هـدف مطالعـه حاضـر ترسـيم نقشه علم بر اساس مقاله هاي منتشر شده در حوزه سياست گذاري رسانه اي بوده است .
Perscheid, Ostern & Moormann 12.
بر اين اساس ، در پژوهش حاضر ٥ سياست اصلي براي صنعت رسانه ، مشتمل بر آزادي بيان ، حريم خصوصي ، کپي رايت ، حفاظت از داده هاي مخاطب و بي طرفي شبکه ، انتخاب و تلاش شده است مقاله هايي که تاکنون در اين حـوزه منتشر شده (در عنوان خود يکي از اين کلمه ها به کار برده شده است ) بررسي شـود.
Charalampopoulos, Katsianis & Varoutas 2.
Results: 900 (from Web of Science Core Collection) You searched for: TITLE: ("copy right" + media) OR TITLE: ("data protection" + media) OR TITLE: ("freedom of speech" + media) OR TITLE: ("media policy") OR TITLE: ("media policies") OR TITLE: ("net neutrality" + media) OR TITLE: ("privacy" + media) OR TITLE: ("regulation" + media) OR TITLE: ("copyright" + media) Timespan: 2000-2019.
همـان گونـه کـه در شکل ١ مشاهده مي شود، بيشترين مقاله هاي سياست گذاري رسـانه اي ، بـه ترتيـب در سـال هـاي ٢٠١٦ و ٢٠١٧ و ٢٠١٨ منتشر شده است .
در اين پژوهش مقاله هاي پژوهشگران مختلف در حوزة سياست گذاري رسانه اي بررسي شـد.
The politics of media policy, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press Freedman, D.
Media Policy for the Digital Age. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Open data policies in social media industry, a model for convergence of views.
Iranian data protection policy in social media; An actor-network theory approaches.