Abstract:
Objective: The aim of this study was to identify, explain the dimensions, components and indicators of research performance of faculty members of the Islamic Azad University of Tehran.Method: The research was conducted with a qualitative approach, using content analysis method. Purposeful sampling, and interviews with experts continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. To determine the logical framework of the data, the steps of identification, note-taking and classification of concepts were performed. Categories were reviewed and duplicates were deleted, similar items were merged, and subject dimensions were identified and leveled. Data analysis method was performed by thematic analysis technique of open, axial and selective coding. Then, in order to assess the validity of the model, an agreement was reached with ten faculty experts in the form of a focus group on the dimensions, components and indicators of the model.Results: The results showed that the extracted model has 9 dimensions, 25 components and 80 indicators to evaluate the research performance of faculty members. The results showed that the indicators of creativity, initiative and innovation are among the components and characteristics of personality and are in the individual dimension.Conclusion: The proposed model can be desirable in evaluating the research performance of faculty members of the Islamic Azad University and eliminating possible problems and obstacles and promoting its creativity and initiative
Machine summary:
Given the importance of the subject, the main problem of the research was to provide a model for evaluating the research performance of faculty members of Islamic Azad University, Tehran Branch, by identifying and explaining the dimensions, components, and indicators of creativity and innovation.
Referenced open codes Employment in organizations Connection with schools Type of selection and employment Evaluations and critiques Connection with industry Critique and correction of books Clear organizational goals Connection with media Order in work Conducting joint research activities with general skills in the field of web and social communication networks and social criteria Students Social Familiarity with search methods Commercialization of research results Public speaking skills Email Authorship, translation, and joint book writing Basic research skills Book translation Perseverance and continuity Advanced research skills / Organization research orientation Rewards Skill in information application Leader research orientation Creation and management of research teams Articles in non-specialized journals Scientific single mappings Participatory decision-making Interpretive articles Job and organizational commitment Critical correction of books Positive participation Technical knowledge production Identification of required information Private sector participation Sufficient personal motivation Mastery of the English language Responsibility Cheerfulness and openness Globalization of research and researcher Control center Self-efficacy Organizational climate Participatory management Innate creativity Judging research projects Information management Creativity in research Judging articles and research journals Speaking in public forums Achieving rank in national festivals Joint research activity with outside Curriculum design expertise Research The country Self-esteem Decentralized structure Organizational culture Lack of pride and arrogance Executive experience in holding conferences Membership in professional associations Lack of centralization in the organization Participatory leadership Member of the scientific board of research journals Correct and up-to-date behaviors Specialized social networks such as ResearchGate Relationship with professional research networks Information retrieval Google / Mendeley / LinkedIn / Academy axial coding, an attempt was made to go slightly beyond the mere description of the interviewee's statements and focus on interpreting their meanings.
(
, 
, 
)
