Abstract:
The Islamic Republic of Iran, as a member state of the NPT treaty, has the legal right to utilize peaceful nuclear energy, and from the perspective of international law, the International Atomic Energy Agency has no legal basis for the gaps created by the West. However, what has remained overlooked until now is the reason for the West's opposition and confrontation with the Islamic Republic of Iran regarding the achievement of nuclear energy. In this research, using the theory of civilizational transition and game theory, the reasons for this issue were evaluated. It seems that what plays the primary role in this competitive game is the oil economy and not the achievement of nuclear energy. The reality is that Iran's history over the past two centuries has been largely controlled and guided by the oil economy. The historical duty of Iranians at present is to deal correctly with this facing crisis.
Machine summary:
However, what non-nuclear weapon states obtained in exchange for accepting this discrimination and inequality, by placing their nuclear facilities under safeguards according to Article III, and by committing to not pursue military nuclear programs according to Article II, can be listed in the following cases: Recognition of the inherent and inalienable right of all countries to exploit nuclear energy for peaceful purposes according to Article IV of the NPT and the preamble of this treaty The right to participate in and benefit from the exchange of nuclear information for peaceful purposes to the maximum extent possible according to Article IV.
In the 2010 NPT Review Conference, among the three fundamental principles existing in the Non-Proliferation Treaty, Obama placed more emphasis on non-proliferation of atomic weapons because, with this principle, he can limit other countries' peaceful use of nuclear energy under various pretexts and, by doing so, deviate from the fundamental principle of global disarmament, which is the concern of various countries, including non-nuclear weapon states and especially the Islamic Republic of Iran.
S/RES/1803, 3 March 2008) Since the beginning of the process of raising the issue of Iran's peaceful nuclear activities in the International Atomic Energy Agency and the Security Council, Iranian officials have always pointed out, by citing certain international standards, especially the rights of states party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, the illegality of the decisions taken and their non-compliance with international law regulations.
(
, 
, 
)
