Abstract:
On one hand، terrorism is a tool for micropowers against the great powers and the strong and on the other hand، it is a tool for the great powers and the powerful against the weak. In other words، terrorism is a “threating tools of all against all”، and historically، the weak and the strong mutually have used it against each other. However، resistance-oriented conception has changed above-mentioned conceptual and political equations in human and Islamic view. Fundamentally، resistance is different from terrorism in terms of means and ends. Resistance is a socio-political action for bringing a defeated discourse back to the text. Today، resistance deals with ethnic، national، religious minorities who feel their sounds may be not heared. Worse than that، they are suppressed، marginalized، and، of course، have been humiliated. Generally، resistance is a result of awakening and knowing about tyranny، tangible discrimination and double standards in global community towards some societies and cultures، which usually results in a horizontal and vertical spread of individual and group’s complexes and beliefs. Therefore، negation of this resistance is –itself-terrorist action. Belief in resistance has resulted in formation of resistance groups and liberation movements. Put exactly، the liberation movements’ signified result from resistance signifier. The main hypothesis of this paper is that gap between resistance and terrorism depend on means and ends. In other words، According to the Quranic teachings، killing innocent people (even one person) fills gap and difference between terrorism and resistance.
Machine summary:
The concept of foreign domination in paragraph 1 of the Declaration granting of independence has been included: "Subjugation of peoples to foreign domination, control and exploitation shall be considered a denial of fundamental human rights and is incompatible with the Charter of the United Nations and contrary to the promotion of international peace and co-operation" 14 Dec. UN DOC A/Res/1514(XV)) (para.
The foundation of the legitimacy of liberation struggles is the effort to achieve the right to self-determination, which, in addition to the United Nations Charter (Article 2(1) and the two International Covenants on Human Rights (the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights), has been emphasized in numerous United Nations resolutions and declarations—for example, the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples (Resolution 1514 adopted on 14 December 1960), the Definition of Aggression resolution XXIX 3314 (14 December 1974), the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, Resolution (XXV) 2625 (24 October 1970).
Any attack on innocent individuals is in contradiction with the provisions of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights as well as Article 2 of the United Nations Charter, which considers the use of force against a state or its territory a violation of international law; therefore, it must be understood how a distinction can be made between terrorism and resistance in such cases.
(
, 
, 
)
