Machine summary:
With this historical fact in mind, the question is why after such a long time and with all the changes that have taken place in the Third World, Iran is still confronted with serious problems in institutionalizing the rational fundaments of political development?
The realm of culture is of course enormous and beyond the scope of one paper; what is discussed here are the theories pertaining to individual culture, group culture, national character, and individual personality?' One of the reasons that have led to the writer's taking this particular causal orientation is the way Iranians have behaved similarly under different political systems.
Why did the political regimes following the Constitutional Revolution of Iran ( 1906) fail to promote a public campaign for rational education to enhance cultural and political change, thereby allowing individuals to abide by the principles ofreason rather than the dominant trend of the day and, hence, enable the nation to speak and act with greater awareness?
Why is this not the case with Third World India or why is it that the people of South Korea and Brazil and Argentina walk the path of political action, political justice, the shift of power, and real elections while we Iranians coming from a country with an ancient heritage of history, literature, and ethics are still entrapped in political deficiencies and disability in regulating a rule-governed and rational political system?
Enjoying a moderate mentality and conduct and a balanced state of mind When underprivileged individuals find their way into the political structure and prioritize a personal agenda over their country's agenda, national development is only a pie in the sky.