Machine summary:
In this context, idea does not mean any kind of conception and affirmation that comes to one's mind, particularly in view of the fact that Shariati tries to separate ideology from science and philosophy.
Now someone like Shariati whose first object of affection is "decisive", "frank", "rebellious" Abuzar, when he seeks to ideologize religion, he specifies the pillars of religion according to his view which is taken from his first enchantment, that is he determines world outlook, ideology, philosophy of history, anthropology and sociology of the school.
These ways include: 1- Ijtihad, 2- commanding the good and enjoining what is unlawful and 3- migration (The solution proposed by Shariati is worthy of attention, but what is important for us now is consensus among theoreticians over this point that ideology is the theory of establishment period and that one should conceive of another idea for the settlement period).
He agreed with religious scholars and their function in a religious society, but he was not in agreement with "clericalism", as a sacred and specific class, who serve as the only interpreters and specify the ideological and practical stands in a final form, and who have special professional interests, and are not subject to criticism and analysis and whose words arc taken as rules.
If a thinker conceives of an ideological design for a society or a religion, it means that a slaughterhouse has been created for thought and wisdom, and that is the only thing he has done.