بهار 1402 - شماره 57 Ranking الف (Ministry of Science)
-
Writer : ابراهیمی، الهام ؛ Corresponding Author : میرشاه ولایتی، فرزانه ؛
(15 page(s) - From 1 to 15 )
Keywords:توانمندسازهانتایجعلوم انسانی و اجتماعیسطح آمادگی فناورانهکاربردی شدنسطح آمادگی کاربردیپذیریApplicability Readiness LevelEnablershumanities and social sciencesTechnology Readiness LevelApplicabilityResults
-
Corresponding Author : پاینده، رضا ؛ Writer : افقهی، سید محمد ؛
(18 page(s) - From 17 to 34 )
Keywords:نوآوریحکمرانیمالیبومسازگان نوآوریمسائل سیستمیفینتکfintechsystemic problemsInnovationFinanceGovernanceInnovation Ecosystem
-
Corresponding Author : نریمانی، میثم ؛ Writer : شجاعی، سید محمد حسین ؛ صاحبکار خراسانی، سید محمد ؛
(16 page(s) - From 35 to 50 )
Keywords:وزارت علومکنشگرسیاست علم و فناوریتحلیل تعارضتحقیقات و فناوری (عتف)conflict AnalysisactorScience and technology policyMinistry of ScienceResearch and Technology
-
Writer : فقیه میرزایی، سمیه ؛ غفاری، فرهاد ؛ شفیعا، محمد علی ؛ Corresponding Author : رضوی، محمد رضا ؛
(19 page(s) - From 51 to 69 )
Keywords:صنعت پلاستیکصنایع پایین دست پتروشیمیتوانمندیهای فناورانهصنعت شویندهصنعت رنگ و رزینPlastics IndustryDetergents IndustryPaint and Resin IndustryDownstream Petrochemical IndustriesTechnological capabilities
-
Writer : جوادی، مجتبی ؛ خندان، علی اصغر ؛ جوانعلی آذر، مرتضی ؛ دانایی فرد، حسن ؛ Corresponding Author : امامی، سید مجتبی ؛
(16 page(s) - From 71 to 86 )
Keywords:آزادی علمیحکمرانی پژوهشآزادی-پاسخگوییاستقلال پژوهشپاسخگویی پژوهشFreedom-AccountabilityResearch AccountabilityGovernance of researchresearch independenceScientific Freedom
-
Corresponding Author : نراقی، نرگس ؛ جوادی، مجتبی ؛
(13 page(s) - From 87 to 99 )
Keywords:پژوهشجهت داریحکمرانی پژوهشجهتدهی پژوهشپژوهش ایدئولوژیکIs research governable? If the answer is positivethese questions are raised: Does governance of research mean injecting ideology into it and ordering it? The researcher's freedom to seek the truth is limited by what kind of mechanisms? what is the place of the norms of the scientific communitythe expectations of external authoritiesincluding the government and societythe demands of customers such as industry in these constraintsand in what process does the researcher become accountable? The purpose of this article is to discuss about these questions and similar topics. This article is a written debate between the author of an article entitled " Governance of Research: A Thewhich was published in the same issue of the Science and Technology Quarterly. The author of the mentioned article is send a letter to the editor of the journal in protest of the reasons for its rejection by the reviewer and entered into a debate witseveral correspondences were made between the author and the reviewerwhose contents are presented in this article without any interference. In shortby referring to the use of some sentences in the articlethe reviewer has argued that the author is seeking to defend ideological science and the necessity of injecting values into researchand this defense is also a result of a misunderstanding of the approach of recent social science paradigms about the presence of values in the research and thus the article has been rejected. By presenting the sources of the sentencesthe author has argued that the reviewer's understanding was not sympathetic and whether the research is ideological or notis not the subject of this articleand then by proposing four binary conceptsthat is"Science/Research""Direction/Ideological""The position of the researcher/ The position of government and science policy actors" and "description/prescription"the theoretical position of the article and the nature of research governance have been described