چکیده:
The research is in accordance with descriptive analysis and has focused on prevention of goods and currency trafficking based on the law. The analytical method is used to study goods & currency trafficking prevention on the basis of law. In order to collect information we used library resources (reliable books & texts published in law journals) and experts deduction and researchers reasoning in this field .The result showed that trafficking crimes can be prevented on the basis of the relevant law. Physical encounter by the judiciary system with the Violators through implementation or application of the rules is insufficient and sometimes the insufficiency of judiciary system make a legal gap which in turn caused a minimum opposition dealing with the phenomenon of trafficking. Rules and regulations that have been analyzed are not appropriate mechanism for the disturbing phenomena of trafficking and has not significant effect on reducing crime related to trafficking .And finally updating laws through adoption of rational and purposeful policies that can be vital and essential dimensions of the fight against trafficking and is strategy to prevent smuggling offences. The result also reviled that the legislature with a suitable understanding of time requirement and also based on lack of efficient legal consciences for perpetrators adopted in 1312 and Subsequent of the accepted laws. Afther gaining expert views and Studies of various organization in Majles research center tried to set A fairly comprehensive legislation .In addition to improvement and updating relevant rules they also make an effort to integrate dispersed laws.
خلاصه ماشینی:
"Different ways of carrying contraband A) carrier is not the owner of the goods and can introduce the product owner: In this case, punishment for perpetrators of trafficking in accordance with Article 5 of the carrier product, the product is considered, therefore government revenue collection agencies the provisions of paragraphs A and B of Article 2 of the Law applies and other local government suspended the application of Article 3 of the Act not to apply.
The passage or non-passage of the crimes of smuggling According to Article 29 of the General and Revolutionary Courts in Criminal Matters Act 1999 procedures and Article 606 of the Penal Code government departments are in principle crime reporter but sometimes the legislator to specific departments or agencies, as the government has allowed the plaintiff or private claims and litigation are referred to the judicial authorities (Such as those mentioned in Article 18 of the Law of hunting and Article 567 of the Penal Code Act of 1967 with subsequent amendments with crimes in the ninth season of the Act, to the historical and cultural properties) If passed in these cases can be filed complaints that the legislator's discretion is vested in them Such as receiving income from government officials about how to apply paragraph A of Article 2 of the Law on smuggling Act of 1995 the government suspended the Expediency Council."