چکیده:
The present paper is an attempt to shed light on metatheorization perspectives and significance of metatheoretical and paradigm studies in order to analyze sociological theories for their more effectiveness in the context of Iranian society. The main question of this study is: what are the factors behind disarray and irreconcilability of sociological theories and how can be they alleviated? The following pivots were taken into consideration in providing answers to the above question: “attention to impacts of cultural، social، psychological and intellectual factors in formation of sociological ideas”، “criticism of fundamental strengthening factors constituting sociological theories” and “deepening of metatheorization discourse”. On the basis of the findings of this paper، the limits of metatheorization are often the borders of “autonomous reason” and its embodiments in the modern world-life; in contrast، in metatheorization based on ontology، anthropology and epistemology founded on monotheistic metaphysics، following the “rational and revelational” definitions of science، the theoretical bottlenecks، stemming from secular approach to society، man and knowledge، are removed and the grounds are prepared for transition from the current disarrays in sociological theories to theoretical unity on the level of fundamental presuppositions constituting the theory.
خلاصه ماشینی:
The most important axes of study in this regard can be enumerated as follows: "the claim of the possibility of borrowing the assumptions of scientific theories from religious propositions", "the perception of religion as a knowledge prior to science and a source of inspiration for hypotheses, models, and styles of explanation" (Bagheri, 1374), "the developments of the meaning of science in pre-modern, modern, and postmodern historical eras", "the need of empirical science for rational sciences", "the relationship between sense, reason, and revelation" (Parsania, 1388), "the influence of human psychological characteristics on the formation of knowledge from the perspective of the Holy Quran" (Miri, 1389), "emphasis on overlooking higher levels of existence", "neglect of a holistic view toward the universe", "not seeing the fundamental concerns of humans", "neglect of the destructive effects of science" (Golshani, 1389), "the necessity of entering reality and the formation of social theory around the axis of Tawhid" (Iman and Kalateh Sadati, 1390), "the coordinated application of ijtihadi, rational, and empirical methods with the aim of theory construction in Islamic sociology" (Mahdavi and Bostan, 1391) and "the necessity of using the Quran in the process of data collection, hypothesis construction, and theorizing for the production of Islamic human sciences with any approach".
(
, 
, 
)
