چکیده:
This research was conducted with the aim of identifying the relationship between organizational forgetting and resistance to change. The statistical population of this research consisted of the General Directorates of Cooperation. The statistical sample consisted of 200 employees of these directorates, who were selected using a stratified random sampling method proportional to the population size. In terms of method, this study is correlational, and in terms of purpose, it is applied. Accordingly, to measure the basic concepts of the research, a questionnaire based on the organizational forgetting model of Halen and Phillips (2004) and the resistance to change questionnaire by Yin et al. (2001) was used. The reliability of the questionnaires was calculated using Cronbach's alpha method for the two mentioned variables as 0.84 and 0.83, respectively. The validity of the test was also confirmed through two methods: content validity and construct validity, using exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and the KMO index. The final findings of the research indicate a significant relationship between organizational forgetting and its dimensions (including purposeful and accidental) and resistance to change.
خلاصه ماشینی:
De Holan and Philips (2004) the voluntary or involuntary loss of organizational knowledge that can lead to changes in the capabilities of the organization Tsang and Zahra (2008) means discarding old procedures to accept new procedures Navarro and Moya (2005) is a dynamic process that identifies and removes ineffective and obsolete knowledge or habits Akgun (2007) quoting Wong there is a common view that forgetting refers to a process of discarding obsolete beliefs and procedures Wong (2012) challenging existing cognitive structures, which includes values and beliefs, especially at the senior management level Fernandez (2009) quoting Wong can be examined from two perspectives; the first perspective refers to accidental and unintended forgetting that leads to the loss of organizational knowledge resources, and the second perspective sees forgetting as a conscious and intentional process that occurs for better organizational learning.
000 Source: Research data Given the results of the table above, since the significance level is less than 0/05, the result is that hypothesis H0 is not confirmed and hypothesis H1, which is the research hypothesis based on the existence of a relationship between organizational forgetting and resistance to change in the studied organizations, is accepted.
000 Source: Research data Given the results of the table above, since the significance level is less than 0/05, the result is that hypothesis H0 is not confirmed and hypothesis H1, which is the research hypothesis based on the existence of a relationship between purposeful organizational forgetting and resistance to change in the studied organizations, is accepted.
(
, 
, 
)
