چکیده:
In recent years, some organizational theorists have attempted to discuss and study various aspects of organizational life with respect to the "interpretive paradigm" and its schools of thought. The aim of these investigations is to add to the credibility of the interpretive paradigm in contrast to the methodology of the positivism school. To this end, they have pursued their research in the form of empirical (testable) programs and have tried to show how much the seemingly stable, tangible, and real aspects of organizational life depend on the individual structure of humans and their perceptions, thereby creating a new literature; such that it can be said to encompass contemporary organizational concepts and assumptions. The present writing presents and examines the views and opinions of this contemporary approach.
خلاصه ماشینی:
To this end, they have pursued their research in the form of empirical (testable) programs and have tried to show how much the seemingly stable, tangible, and real aspects of organizational life depend on the individual structure of humans and their perceptions; in this way, they have created a new literature that can be said to encompass contemporary concepts and assumptions of the organization.
In this regard, awareness of the following points is useful: A- The researcher's goal is to find out the "why" of behavior; B- From Weber's perspective, when the subject of study is the identification and understanding of the actor's (individual or individuals) perceptions, the correctness or incorrectness, or the truth or falsehood of those perceptions or behaviors is not what matters, but rather the goal is to understand the meanings perceived by the actors and human beings; C- The ideal type is a tool for reconstructing reality (some philosophers of science believe: that saying the work of scientists is the recognition of reality is a baseless claim, because no human, even if they are a scientist, is capable of an objective recognition of reality.
Ethnomethodology, influenced by Husserl's phenomenology, criticizes organizational theorists whose use of empirical science methodology has led to an excessive reliance on simple and superficial statistical structures, resulting in superficial and stereotypical organizational studies, to the extent that the absence of a strong analysis regarding organizational concepts is extremely palpable today.
(
, 
, 
)
