Abstract:
هر رویکرد فلسفی و عقلانی مناسب به تکنولوژی باید بتواند موضع خود را نسبت به حد و حدود نقدپذیری روشن کند. بهرغم اینکه حفظ آموزه نقدپذیری به نظر ساده میآید، بسیاری از نظامهای فلسفی با اتخاذ رویکردهای موجهگرا یا ذاتگرا در معرفتشناسی، زمینه فلسفی لازم برای نقدپذیری تمامعیار را از میان میبرند. مقاله توضیح خواهد داد که حفظ آموزه نقدپذیری تمامعیار با اتخاذ یک معرفتشناسی غیر موجهگرا و تفکیک قضایا از معیارها میسر است و عدم رعایت این آموزهها به نتایج نامطلوبی میانجامد.
Any adequate philosophy of technology needs to take a clear stance with regard to the limits of criticizability. While observing the canons of criticizability may appear to be simple, many philosophical approaches (whether towards technology or other topics) abandon comprehensive criticizability by adopting some forms of justificationist or essentialist epistemology. This paper aims to show that criticizability can only be upheld by subscribing to a non-justificationist epistemology and by acknowledging the propositions/standards dichotomy; failing to do so leads to undesirable epistemic consequences.Any adequate philosophy of technology needs to take a clear stance with regard to the limits of criticizability. While observing the canons of criticizability may appear to be simple, many philosophical approaches (whether towards technology or other topics) abandon comprehensive criticizability by adopting some forms of justificationist or essentialist epistemology. This paper aims to show that criticizability can only be upheld by subscribing to a non-justificationist epistemology and by acknowledging the propositions/standards dichotomy; failing to do so leads to undesirable epistemic consequences.