Abstract:
مقدمه: جوانان بهعنوان یک سرمایۀ اجتماعی نیروی بالنده و موتور محرکۀ یک کشور هستند که در صورت برنامهریزی و آموزش صحیح بهعنوان نیرویی فعال در اعتلای اهداف عالی جامعه عمل میکنند؛ اما در برخی مناطق ازجمله حاشیهنشین بهخاطر شرایط جغرافیایی، نبودِ خدمترسانی، فقر، رواج بزهکاری و اعتیاد و ... جوانان در معرض انواع آسیبهای اجتماعی قرار میگیرند. هدف پژوهش: در این مقاله تلاش شده است، با مطالعۀ پیشینۀ پژوهش و منابع، ابعاد توانمندسازی جوانان استخراج شده و با تهیۀ پرسشنامه وضعیت جوانان از نظر این ابعاد بررسی شود. روششناسی تحقیق: این پژوهش از نوع، توصیفی-تحلیلی و ازنظر هدف، کاربردی است. برای تعیین حجم نمونه با توجه به جامعۀ آماری این محله که طبق سرشماری سال 1395 بالغ بر ۳۷۲۴۹ نفر بوده، از فرمول کوکران استفاده شده است. ابتدا 30 پرسشنامه در میان جوانان توزیع شد. بعد از تکمیل پرسشنامه و طبق واریانس بهدستآمده از نمونۀ اولیه و با توجه به شناخت از محل 200 نفر محاسبه شد. دادهها با ابزار پرسشنامه جمعآوری شد که از طریق آنلاین و منتشرشدن در شبکههای اجتماعی یا ارسال لینک با حضور در محل و ارسال پیامکی و همچنین تکمیل دستی انجام و با استفاده از نرمافزار spss و amos تحلیل شد. نتایج: حاکی از آن است که عامل محیط بیشترین بار عاملی را با وزن 94/0 به خود اختصاص داده است؛ همچنین عامل زمینۀ شخصی با بار عاملی 84/0 در مرتبۀ بعد قرار دارد که نشاندهندۀ وجود زمینۀ زیاد برای برنامههای توانمندسازی در بین جوانان است.
AbstractAs a social capital, youths are the driving force of a country, and if they are properly planned and trained, they can act as an active force in raising the high goals of the society. But in some areas, including marginal areas, due to geographical conditions, lack of service, poverty, the prevalence of delinquency and addiction, etc., young people are exposed to all kinds of social harm. In the present study, by studying the background of the research and sources, we have extracted the dimensions of youth empowerment in Ali Ibn Abitaleb Neighbourhood (Arak City) by preparing a questionnaire. This research is descriptive-analytical and practical in terms of purpose. The sample size was determined according to the statistical population of this neighborhood using Cochran's formula. According to the census 2015, the population of the area was 37,249 people. First, questionnaires were distributed (online and manually) among young people, after completing the questionnaire, 200 people were selected according to the variance obtained from the initial sample. The data were analyzed using SPSS and AMOS software. The results indicate that the environmental factor has the highest factor load with a weight of 0.94. Also, the factor of personal context with a factor load of 0.84 is in the next order, which indicates the existence of a high context for empowerment programs among young people.Keywords: Empowerment, Youth, Ali Ibn Abitaleb Neighbourhood, Arak City. IntroductionYoung people are willing to strive for change that affects well-being, health, and citizenship status, which should be at the forefront of global change and innovation. They are the main foundation of a country, the main sub-structure of any social structure, and the backbone of any successful nation. In addition, they are the driving force of the country's development and active citizens who participate in building stronger and more just societies. For this reason, they should be seen beyond themselves, because in this period of transition between adolescence and youth, young people are recognized as an active and fully responsible member of the society. This stage is also a period when identity crises affect the individual. The psychological structure is dominant and their identities are never complete but constantly changing. Therefore, youth empowerment as one of the main elements of youth participation is the key to sustainable development and a phenomenon by which young people realize the choices they have or can make. To this end, the purpose of the present study is to evaluate youth empowerment in Ali Ibn Abitaleb Neighbourhood (Arak City). Materials and MethodsThe present study is descriptive-analytical and applied in terms of purpose. In this research, the data were collected through an online questionnaire via publishing it on social networks, and sending links randomly and as SMS to people, as well as filling out the questionnaire manually. The population of the studied area is 37,249. Using Cochran's formula, questionnaires were distributed among 200 young people. Cronbach's alpha test was used to measure the reliability of the research tool, which was calculated as 0.912 for the variables of the questionnaire. In order to explain and model the effects, structural equation modeling (SEM) was used in AMOS software by drawing a second-order factor analysis model. Also, to test the research hypotheses, one sample t-test was used in SPSS software. Research FindingsThe results of this study indicate that the environmental factor with a weight of 0.94 has the highest factor load. Also, the coefficient of personal context with a factor load of 0.84 is in the next order, which indicates the existence of a high platform for empowerment programs among young people. In the next order is the identity coefficient, which ranks third with a factor load of 0.76. In the next order is the education coefficient, which ranks fourth with a factor load of 0.70. And finally, the training coefficient has the lowest factor load with 0.42. Each of the items are discussed in the next section. Discussion of Results and ConclusionConsidering the results of the study, in the first hypothesis, which is related to the personal context of the people, the results show that the youth of this neighborhood in the variables of success in favorable conditions, success with the group and helping others, interest in group work, change of destiny by the individual, willingness to learn skills, belief in progress through education, interest in sports, the effect of sports on learning and interest in filling free time with sports have favorable conditions. Programs are needed only in the variable of accepting the society's rules because it is at an average level. And these conditions show that the youth of this neighborhood are very prone to progress and become empowered in case of favorable conditions. In the factor analysis model, the personal context with a factor load of 0.84 has the most impact after the environmental factor in empowering young people. This shows that the young people of this area have a high ground for empowerment if other factors are provided.In the second hypothesis, the environmental factor was tested. It was found that the variables of the importance of moral principles for parents, satisfaction with life with parents, security in the neighborhood, the help of adults, and belonging to the city as a citizen are at a good level, but the variable of satisfaction with the government service is lower than the average, which shows the lack of attention to this neighborhood. In the factor analysis model, the environmental factor with a factor load of 0.94 had the greatest effect and was ranked first in terms of importance. Therefore, this factor is very important in empowering young people.In the third hypothesis that the education factor was put to the test, the variables of the importance of progress for parents, the usefulness of school education, the effect of school education on self-confidence, satisfaction with school, the usefulness of school education, and the change of insight in school were at a favorable level, which shows good education status in this place. This factor was ranked fourth in the factor analysis model with a factor load of .70.In the fourth hypothesis, the factor of sports was tested, and the variable of neighborhood sports facilities, public spaces and parks for sports, and access to sports facilities in other neighborhoods were reported to be weak.Finally, in the fifth hypothesis, in the identity factor, the variables of liking the neighborhood, group success, pride in being Iranian, pride in playing the national anthem, defending the country, honesty of Iranians, desire to learn about the country's history, respect for the country's flag, imams' role models, the performance of duties and activities of Basij and the mosque were desirable and good places. The variable attendance at the mosque and Basij base was at the average level, which shows that this variable is not well received. In terms of importance, this factor was ranked third in the factor analysis model with a factor load of 0.76. This factor shows that the conditions of this factor in the neighborhood are favorable. ReferencesPersian References- Arabi, M., & Fayazi, M. (2006). Typology of perspectives and patterns of empowerment. Journal of Industrial Management Studies, 4(13), 67-88.- Dadandish, P., & Rahnavard, H. (2018). The effect of quality education on youth employment and personal identity. Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies Center of the Ministry of Sports and Youth, 18(44), 217-236.- Dehghan Qahfarkhi, A., & Rashidalmir, A. (2018). Social exclusion, youth delinquency and sports participation. Journal of Physiology and Management Researches in Sports, 9(4), 9-16.- Fuladiyan, M., Rezaei Bahrabad, H., & Sohanian Haghigi, M. (2019). Investigating the evolution of Iranian youth identity (1353-1394). Journal of Culture-Communication Studies, 21(49), 147-179.- Harandi, F., & Fallah Mohsen Khani, Z. (2007). Youth employment and its challenges. Journal of Social Welfare, 6(25), 133-146.- Heydari, R., & Shatrian, M. (2016). An introduction to the empowerment of local urban communities. First Edition. Tehran: Sokhnoran Publication.- Khosravani, A., Mohseni, R., & Sabouri Khosrowshahi, H. (2017). Investigating the impact of the culture of poverty on the occurrence of social deviations in the lower neighborhoods of Arak city (case example: Bagh Khalj neighborhood of Arak). Social Research, 10(40), 44-63.- Khosravani, A., Mohseni, R., & Sabouri Khosrowshahi, H. (2018). The relationship between urban poverty and the culture of poverty in the lower neighborhoods of Arak City. Social Welfare, 72(19), 283-321.- Malek Hosseini, A., & Jodaki, H. (2009). Investigation and organization of marginalized neighborhoods in Iran (case example: Arak, Bagh Khalaj neighborhood). Geography, 3(11), 147-174.- Mohammadi, M. (2002). Employee empowerment programs. Management Studies (Improvement and Transformation), 9(35-36), 159-185.- Rahnavard, F., & Hosseini, N. (2008). Factors affecting the empowerment of women. Journal of Women in Development and Politics (Women's Research), 6(1), 105-118.- Sam Aram, A., Sharifian, A., & Yazdanpour, F. (2018). Designing and testing the model of social empowerment: women drug users (Arak football neighborhood). Social Order, 11(1), 77-96.- Sharifi, A., & Kakavandi, A. (2010). The relationship between family social capital and youth identity. Research on Youth, Culture and Society, (4), 25-50.- Touhidi, S., & Al-Hosseini, H. (2015). Investigating the employability of Iranian youth. Strategic Studies of Sport and Youth, 29(14), 31-48- Yasuri, M. (2011). The role of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in empowering rural women and youth (example: Urdughash village). Human Settlement Planning Studies (Geographic Perspective), 6(17), 44-60. English References- Chinman, M. J., & Linney, J. A. (1998). Toward a model of adolescent empowerment: Theoretical and empirical evidence. Journal of Primary Prevention, 18, 393-413.- Diraditsile, K. (2020). Accelerating youth empowerment for a sustainable development in Botswana: Assessment of potential, prospects and development. In: Politics and sustainable development in Africa. Centre for Democracy, Research and Development.- Gill, S. A., Aftab, R., Rehman, S. U., & Javaid, S. (2019). Youth empowerment and sustainable development. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 35 (3). 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-0024- 2018- 02.- Gutierrez, L., GlenMaye, L., & DeLois, K. (1995). The organizational context of empowerment practice: Implications for social work administration. Social Work, 40(2), 249-258.- Ile, I., Boadu, E. S., Ile, I., & Boadu, E. S. (2018). The paradox of youth empowerment : Exploring youth intervention programme in Ghana The paradox of youth empowerment : Exploring youth intervention programme in Ghana. Cogent Social Sciences, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2018.1528709- Kohfeldt, D., Chhun, L., Grace, S., & Langhout, R. D. (2011). Youth Empowerment in Context: Exploring Tensions in School-Based yPAR. American Journal of Community Psychology, 47(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9376-z.- Lardier, D. T., Opara, I., Garcia-Reid, P., & Reid, R. J. (2020). The Cognitive Empowerment Scale: Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Analysis Among Youth of Color. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 37(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-019-00647-2.- Ma, E., Zhang, Y., Xu, F. Z., Wang, D., & Kim, M. (Sunny). (2021). Feeling empowered and doing good? A psychological mechanism of empowerment, self-esteem, perceived trust, and OCBs. Tourism Management, 87(April), 104356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104356.- Mohajer, N., & Earnest, J. (2009). Youth empowerment for the most vulnerable: A model based on the pedagogy of Freire and experiences in the field. Health Education, 1.- Paz, A., Lu, Y., & Randolph, W. A. (n.d.). Why Is It So Hard to Achieve? (n.p).- Saqlain, N. (2019). Child and youth empowerment through sports. (n.p).- Ucar Martinez, X., Jimenez-Morales, M., Soler Maso, P., & Trilla Bernet, J. (2017). Exploring the conceptualization and research of empowerment in the field of youth. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 22(4), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2016.1209120.
Machine summary:
مباني نظري پژوهش اصطلاح توانمندسازي (EMPOWERMENT) که در زبان فارسي مترادف قدرتمندسازي ، کارآمدسـازي ، تواناسـازي و توان افزايي است (ياسوري ، ١٣٩٠)، به معناي دادن قدرت يا اختيار به شخصي براي انجـام عملـي اسـت و بـر توانمندسـازي فردي دلالت دارد (شاطريان و حيدري ، ١٣٩٦)؛ همچنين در محـيط هـاي اجتمـاعي ، فرهنگـي و سياسـي مختلـف معـاني و مفاهيم متفاوتي دارد (اعرابي و فياضي ، ١٣٨٨)، در همه جا رايج و به طرق مختلف اسـتفاده شـده اسـت ,.
جدول (١) نتايج آزمون t تک نمونه اي، شاخص زمينۀ شخصي Table (1) The results of the t-test are single examples, personal background index شاخص کد گويه آمارة t سطح اختلاف حد پايين حد بالا معناداري ميانگين ٧ موفقيت در شرايط مطلوب ١٣/٣٢٢ 0/000 0/92500 0/7881 1/0619 ٨ موفقيت با گروه و کمک ديگران ١١/١٣٢ 0/000 0/76500 0/6295 0/9005 ٩ علاقه به کارهاي گروهي ٨/٦٥٩ 0/000 0/67500 0/5213 0/8287 ١٠ تغيير سرنوشت توسط خود فرد ١٢/٣٨٣ 0/000 0/89000 0/7483 1/0317 ١٢ پذيرفتن قوانين جامعه ١/٢٢٨ 0/221 0/10000 -/0606 0/2606 ٢٢ تمايل به آموزش مهارت ٢٠/٣٨٩ 0/000 1/34500 1/2149 1/4751 ٢٨ اعتقاد به پيشرفت از طريق تحصيل ٨/٤٥٩ 0/000 0/72000 0/5522 0/8878 32 علاقه به ورزش 14/594 0/000 1/13000 0/9773 1/2827 ٣٥ تأثير ورزش در يادگيري ١٢/٩٩٣ 0/000 0/97000 0/8228 1/1172 ٣٦ علاقه به پرکردن اوقات فراغت با ورزش ١٣/٤٢٠ 0/000 0/96000 0/8189 1/1011 مجموع 19/696 0/000 0/84800 0/7631 0/9329 شرايط محيطي محله در فرضيۀ دوم عنوان شده است ، شرايط محيطي محلۀ کوي علي ابن ابيطالب اراک براي توانمندسـازي جوانـان مناسـب است .