چکیده:
Jurisprudence of governance, as far as its govermental aspects is concerned, represents an evolutionary stage in this field of study. It not only addresses contemporary needs but also considers the optimal administration of the Law-based (shariʽa) system of society at a macro-social level. This field is the product of the evolution and development of the science of the principles of jurisprudence, shaped on the basis of new exigencies, contemporary needs, and issues arising from the capacity of governance. Understanding approaches – based on the views of legal or rational theoreticians – to the issue at hand is of significant importance in comprehending the rationale and manner of the emergence of minimal or maximal functions of the science of the Principles of jurisprudence. Through the analysis of such an approach, it becomes possible to identify existing gaps and realise the potential of macro jurisprudence. Therefore, in this research work, a descriptive-analytical method is used to explain the approaches based on the Principles and characteristics governing the Principles of jurisprudence of governance. Ultimately, it can be said that the realisation of such an approach in the science of Principles depends on factors such as prioritising the macro interests of the system and society over individual interests, creating systematic and coordinated thinking in the field of jurisprudence and its principles, increasing the capabilities and efficiency of jurisprudence in responding to social issues, and transforming it into a practical and executive system at the level of management and administration of Islamic society.
خلاصه ماشینی:
In conclusion, it can be said that the realization of such an approach in the science of principles depends on factors such as prioritizing the macro-interests of the system and society over individual interests, creating systematic and coordinated thinking in the field of jurisprudence and principles, increasing the capabilities and efficiency of jurisprudence in responding to social issues, and transforming it into a practical and executive system at the level of management and administration of the Islamic society.
Individual approach Until before the formation of the Islamic Revolution and the establishment of a religious government, Shia jurisprudence, due to the dominance of the individual approach and the lack of codification based on the requirements of the country's management system, had an individualistic view of Sharia and the behavior of the obligated; for this reason, jurists derived jurisprudential discussions not at the level of macro social management, but in response to the needs of believers and at the level of managing personal status needs.
When the goal-setting of jurisprudence is the evolution of social systems and their administration and regulation at the level of governance, not only the type of topics in the principles will change, but also the arrangement of its chapters will be different, and this strategy will enhance the efficiency of the science of principles to an appropriate level that deduces the process of administration and supervision of society in accordance with the values governing religion; because the approach of governmental jurisprudence and the leadership of all societal affairs by jurisprudence is based on a comprehensive, complete, and coherent insight into religion.
(
, 
, 
)
