چکیده:
The science of jurisprudence, with the subject of the actions of the obligated, is divided into two general categories: jurisprudence of worship (ibadat) and jurisprudence of transactions (muamalat). According to jurists, Taqlid in these two areas has no difference, and multiple authorities pose no prohibition. However, what requires further investigation is whether, in the event of the establishment of an Islamic government during the era of Occultation, and considering the discussion of leadership by a qualified jurist (faqih jami' al-shara'it) and the approval of Islamic laws in this government based on his fatwas, there still exists a duality of authority and leadership in all or some chapters of jurisprudence or not? This writing is organized by basing itself on the thought of the appointment of a qualified jurist in the era of Occultation and by referring to books and articles presented regarding Wilayat al-Faqih and discussions related to ijtihad and Taqlid. The outcome of the present research is that if an Islamic government is established under the leadership of a qualified jurist based on the thought of appointment, in the rulings related to the jurisprudence of transactions, no duality exists in terms of authority and leadership, and the laws are mandatory for everyone to follow. Regarding the rulings related to the jurisprudence of worship, two views exist: some followers of the thought of appointment consider the position of issuing fatwas to be a specific office of the Wali al-Faqih, but from the perspective of others, jurists are independent in the jurisprudence of worship, and the duality of authority and leadership still exists.
خلاصه ماشینی:
However, what requires further investigation is whether, in the event of the establishment of an Islamic government during the Age of Occultation, and considering the discussion of the leadership of a comprehensive jurist (Faqih Jami al-Shara'it) and the approval of Islamic laws in this government based on his fatwas, a duality of religious authority and leadership still exists in all or some chapters of jurisprudence or not?
The outcome of the present research is that if an Islamic government is established under the leadership of a comprehensive jurist based on the thought of appointment, there is no duality in terms of religious authority and leadership in the rulings related to the jurisprudence of transactions, and the laws are mandatory for everyone to follow.
Regarding the rulings related to the jurisprudence of acts of worship, there are two views: some followers of the thought of appointment consider the position of issuing fatwas to be a specific office of the Wali al-Faqih, but from the perspective of others, jurists are independent in the jurisprudence of acts of worship, and the duality of religious authority and leadership still exists.
Discussions regarding these matters have been raised in the words of jurists, but the question that has not been addressed is: in the era of establishing an Islamic government based on the thought of appointment and the establishment of the authority of the Faqih, in the event that there are multiple individuals who meet the jurisprudential conditions for Taqlid, does the possibility of Taqlid in the sense used before this period exist from theoretical, scientific, practical, and executive perspectives?
(
, 
, 
)
