چکیده:
In this article, the criteria for religiousness from the perspective of clergy and academics are examined and compared. The term 'criteria of religiousness' refers to the basis upon which one judges their own religiousness or that of others. Using Weber's view on the relationship between social conditions and religious interpretations, as well as theories of secularization, and considering the social characteristics of the two studied groups—including the greater connection of academics to scientific institutions and modern values—the hypothesis was proposed that clergy and academics have different criteria for judging religiousness; academics place more emphasis on general moral aspects and less emphasis on ritualistic, collective, and Sharia or jurisprudential ethical aspects. Using a questionnaire designed based on a multidimensional model of religiousness, respondents were asked about the importance of various indicators of religiousness dimensions for judging individuals' religiousness. The research findings showed that academics and clergy have different emphases on various dimensions of religiousness within their respective criteria. While from the perspective of the clergy, all dimensions of religiousness were of high and almost equal importance, academics placed special emphasis on general moral aspects.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Using Weber's view on the relationship between social conditions and religious interpretations and expressions, as well as theories of secularization, and considering the social characteristics of the two studied groups—including the greater connection of academics to scientific institutions and modern values—the hypothesis was proposed that clergy and academics have different criteria for judging religiosity.
Scientific Theoretical Background - Research Quarterly Many theorists have addressed the relationship between social conditions and religion and religiosity; for example, based on Marx's view, "the division of society into various classes, political, moral, and religious worldviews, follows an empirical comparison of various criteria...
Scientific-Research Quarterly Theoretical Framework Fourth Period Now it is necessary, just as Weber discusses the religiosity of different groups and their religious expressions and interpretations in Number 4 relation to the social conditions of those groups, to examine the social conditions of the groups Winter 1390 under consideration in this study, so that based on their social conditions and the values dominating their occupational experience, we can obtain implications for their criteria of religiosity.
Based on the results related to the Scientific-Research Quarterly the set of items, the order of importance of dimensions for seminary clerics is: beliefs, faith, collective Sharia, ethics, individual Sharia, individual worship, collective worship, and religious knowledge.
This research, based on the theoretical framework of Max Weber and other sociologists of religion and also based on secularization theories, examined the issue of the difference in religiosity criteria between the two groups of clerics and academics.
(
, 
, 
)
