Abstract:
هدف اصلی پژوهش حاضر، شناسایی و بررسی کجرفتاریهای مشتریان درنتیجۀ سوگیریهای ذهنی مؤثر بر آنها درزمینۀ سرمایهگذاری (در بانک و بورس) است که براساس مطالعات موجود و واقعیت بازار سرمایه اهمیت زیادی در مسیر توسعۀ اقتصادی کشور دارد. این پژوهش بهروش آمیخته (کیفی و کمّی) انجام شده است. پس از مطالعه و گردآوری مصادیق کجرفتاری و سوگیریهای ذهنی مؤثر بر کجرفتاری مشتریان و سرمایهگذاران ازطریق منابع علمی و انجام مصاحبههای عمیق نیمهساختاریافته با 17 صاحبنظر و تحلیل آن بهشیوۀ تحلیل مضمون، پرسشنامهها بین مشتریان خدمات سرمایهگذاری (بانک و بورس) توزیع و جمعآوری شد که ازطریق تحلیل عاملیاکتشافی و با کمک نرمافزارهای SPSS 22 و AMOS 24 دادههای جمعآوریشده (384 پرسشنامه) تحلیل شد. بهعبارت دیگر، پس از تعیین مصادیق کجرفتاری مشتریان با کمک خبرگان، سوگیریهای ذهنی که به وقوع این کجرفتاریها در حوزۀ خدمات سرمایهگذاری منجر میشود، شناسایی و مطالعه و دستهبندی شدند. نتایج پژوهش حاضر حاکی از وجود 3 دسته سوگیری ذهنی در بین مشتریان صنعت خدمات مالی است که گروه جدیدی از عوامل با عنوان «سوگیریهای ارزشی یا اعتقادی» در این پژوهش برای نخستین بار کشف و بررسی شد. بهطور کلی، در این پژوهش علاوهبر شناسایی 5 نوع کجرفتاری در بین مشتریان، همۀ سوگیریهای ذهنی مشتریان خدمات مالی (بورس و بانک) در سه گروهِ سوگیریهای قضاوتی یا شناختی، سوگیریهای حسی یا ترجیحی و سوگیریهای ارزشی یا اعتقادی دستهبندی شدند.
Human behavior and decision-making processes have been the subject of studies by many researchers, especially in the field of marketing. Basically, the purpose of such studies is to identify the impact of psychological, behavioral, and cognitive aspects in decision making. In the framework of this view, a theoretical scientific framework was created that shows behavioral economics, which briefly aims to integrate psychological aspects in the decision-making process of economic and financial affairs. According to this study, the research conducted in this field aims to investigate the way people make decisions and how they interact or influence other people, organizations, markets, and society. On the other hand, the investment decision-making process (investor behavior) is influenced by various behavioral biases that deviate investors from rationality and cause irrational and illogical decisions. In fact, this field focuses on the behavior of investors and their decision-making process. Overconfidence, herding, anchoring, cognitive dissonance, availability bias, self-attribution, mental accounting, framing, and representative bias are a few of the biases that have a major impact on people's investment decisions.The main goal of the current research is to identify and investigate the misbehavior of customers as a result of mental biases affecting them in the field of investment (in the bank and stock market), which, based on existing studies and the reality of the capital market, is of great importance in the country’s economic development. This research has been done using a mixed-methods approach (qualitative and quantitative). In the qualitative part, the research community includes experts (including professors and researchers in the field of customer behavior and behavioral economics, as well as managers and executive experts with membership in high levels of banking and stock exchange organizations) and informed customers (familiar with various investment methods and having at least 5 years of investment activity). Sampling has been done in a purposeful or judgmental way (using people who have sufficient expertise and necessary information in the field of research) with 17 people. Also, the theme analysis approach has been used to analyze and systematically code qualitative data and develop themes. The data collection method in this section is semi-structured in-depth interviews (to discover and confirm the final components and their relationships). The content validity ratio of CVR has been also measured for interview questions by using the opinions of 10 experts. According to Lawshes’ opinion, after modifying, deleting, or merging questions with lower than acceptable CVR, the calculated CVR for the final questions of the questionnaire was larger than or equal to 0.65 (higher than 0.62). For measuring the reliability of the interviews Cohen's kappa coefficient and formula were also used, which was measured at 0.55 in this research, according to the guide table of Landis and Koch’s was considered higher than average. In the quantitative part of the research, the statistical population is all clients of investment services of Tehran’s Banks and Stock Exchange, and a sample of 384 people (based on Cochran's formula for unlimited societies) has been examined (351 people electronically and 33 people by paper and telephone for access to the desired sample were questioned). The method used for data analysis and model testing in this section is structural equation modeling, which was modeled and implemented using Amos software. The data collection tool was a 30-question Likert scale questionnaire. In order to confirm the construct validity, Bartlett's level of significance must be less than 5 percent, which in this study ‘zero’ is confirmed. The sampling adequacy statistic is 0.685. It should be noted that the reliability of the entire questionnaire was acceptable with a rate of 0.894, but the anchoring component was removed from the analysis due to an alpha of 0.6 (lower than 0.7).The final result of the current research indicates the existence of 3 categories of mental biases among customers of the financial services industry, and a new group of factors called ‘value or belief biases’ was discovered and investigated for the first time in this research. In general, in this research, in addition to identifying 5 types of misbehavior among customers, all mental biases of financial service customers (stock market and bank) were categorized into three groups: judgmental or cognitive biases, sensory or preference biases, and value or belief biases. Keywords: Customer Misbehavior, Mental Bias, Cognitive Bias, Sensory Bias, Belief Bias. References- Aigbovo O., & Ilaboya O. J. (2019). Does behavioural biases influences individual investment decisions. Journal of Management Science Review, 10(1), 68-89- Barberis, N. (2002). A survey of behavioral finance. National Bureau of Economic Research.- Costa, D. F., Carvalho, F. D. M., & Moreira, B. C. D. M. (2018). Behavioral economics and behavioral finance: A bibliometric analysis of the scientific fields. Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(1), 3-24.- Grinbllate, M., & Han, B. (2005). Prospect theory, mental accounting and momentum. Journal of Financial Economics, 78(2), 311–339.- Hursh, S. R., & Roma, P. G. (2016). Behavioral economics and the analysis of consumption and choice. Journal of Managerial and Decision Economics, 37(4-5), 224–238.- Jahanmiri, M., Roodposhti, F. R., & Nikoomaram, H. (2018). Anchoring bias a criterion for explain profitability of 52-weeks high and momentum strategies. Pacific Business Review International Journal, 10(7), 115-124.- Joo, B. A., & Durri, K. (2017). Influence of overconfidence, optimism and pessimism on the rationality of the individual investors: An empirical analysis. Pacific Business Review International Journal, 9(12), 7-13.- Kahneman, D., & Reipe, M. W. (2004). Aspects of investor psychology. Journal of Portfolio Management, 24(4), 52-64- Karimi, K., & rahnamaroodposhti, F. (2015). Behavioral biases and earning management. PhD Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran.- Koesrindartoto, P. D., Aaron, A., Yusgiantoro, I., Dharma, W. A., & Arroisi, A. (2020). Who moves the stock market in an emerging country–Institutional or retail investors?. Journal of Research in International Business and Finance, 51, 101061- Liu, J., Jin, X., Wang, T., & Yuan, Y. (2015). Robust multi-period portfolio model based on prospect theory and ALMV-PSO algorithm. Journal of Expert Systems with Applications, 42(20), 7252-7262.- Madaan, G., & Singh, S. (2019). An analysis of behavioral biases in investment decision-making. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(4), 55-67.- Magoon, M., & Hursh, S. R. )2011(. The behavioral economics of transportation travel time, mode choice and carbon impact. In 5th annual Behavior, Energy and Climate Change Conference (BECC). Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.stanford.edu/ group/peec/ cgibin/ docs/ events/2011/ becc/ presentations/9%20The %20 Behavioral %20Economics %20-%20Mike %20Magoon .pdf- Mertzanis, C., & Allam, N. (2018). Political instability and herding behaviour: Evidence from Egypt’s stock market. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 17(1), 29-59.- Mushinada, V. N. C., & Veluri, V. S. S. (2018). Investors overconfidence behaviour at Bombay stock exchange. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 14(5), 613-632.- Niehaus, G., & Shrider, D. (2014). Framing and the disposition effect: Evidence from mutual fund investor redemption behavior. Journal of Quantitative Finance, 14(4), 683-697.- Pompian, M. (2012). Behavioral finance and investor types: Managing behavior to make better investment decisions. New York: John Wiley & Sons.- Qawi, B. R. (2010). Behavioral finance: Is investor psyche driving market performance?. The IUP Journal of Behavioral Finance,7(4), 7-19- Razek, Y. H. (2011). An overview of behavioral finance and revisiting the behavioral life cycle hypothesis. The IUP Journal of Behavioral Finance, 8(3), 7-24.- Rehan, R., & Umer, I. (2017). Behavioural biases and investor decisions. Journal of Market Forces, 12(2), 12-20.- Rockenback, B. (2004). The behavioral relevance of mental accounting for the pricing of financial options. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 53(4), 513-527.- Shafi, M. (2014). Determinants influencing individual investor behavior in stock market: A cross country research survey. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 2(1), 60-71.- Shah, S. Z. A., Ahmad, M., & Mahmood, F. (2018). Heuristic biases in investment decision-making and perceived market efficiency: A survey at the Pakistan stock exchange. Journal of Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 10(1), 85-110.- Shefrin, H. (2001). Some new evidence on eva companies. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 22(1), 32-42.- Shin, H., & Park, S. (2018). Do foreign investors mitigate anchoring bias in stock market? Evidence based on post-earnings announcement drift. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 48, 224-240- Singh, S. (2016). The role of behavioral finance in modern age investment. Pacific Business Review International Journal, 1(1), 234-240.- ul Abdin, S. Z., Farooq, O., Sultana, N., & Farooq, M. (2017). The impact of heuristics on investment decision and performance: Exploring multiple mediation mechanisms. Journal of Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 674-688.- Walters, D. J., Fernbach, P. M., Fox, C. R., & Sloman, S. A. (2016). Known unknowns: A critical determinant of confidence and calibration. Journal of Management Science, 63(12), 4298-4307. - Yu, H., Dan, M. H., Ma, Q., & Jin, J. (2018). They all do it, will you? Event related potential evidence of herding behavior in online peer-to-peer lending. Journal of Neuroscience Letters, 681, 1-5.
Machine summary:
حوزۀ اقتصاد رفتاری و بهطور خاص، مالیرفتاری مطالعاتی را در بر میگیرد که چگونگی تأثیر روانشناسی بر بازارهای مالی و تصمیمگیری مالی را بررسی میک 4 Singh" 5 " Shefrin"/>" Shefrin"/>، 2001) و پدیدۀ جدیدی در بازارهای مالی محسوب میشود که در پاسخ به موانع موجود در بازار مالی سنّتی پدید آمده است؛ زیرا در بازارهای مالی سنّتی، بازیگران کاملاً Costa, Carvalho & Moreira Shafi Koesrindartotoa, Aarona, Yusgiantorob, Dharmaa & Arroisi Madaan & Singh Shefrin (باربريز 1 ، 2002).
همانطور که پیشتر به آن اشاره ش Niehaus & Shrider Liu, Jin, Wang & Yuan Overconfidence herding anchoring cognitive dissonance availability bias self-attribution mental accounting framing representative bias Singh Pompian Kahneman & Reipe نوع تورش رفتاری وجود دارد که باتوجهبه پژوهشهای گوناگون و منابع علمی موجود، به برخی موارد بهعنوان مهمترین سوگیریها و خطاهای ذهنی و رفتاری مشتریان خدمات سرمایهگذاری بیشتر پرداخته میشود.
تورش ادراکی ناشی از Joo Walters, Fernbach, Fox & Sloman Mushinada & Veluri Abdin, Farooq, Sultana & Farooq Mertzanis & Allam Yu, Dan, Ma & Jin Shin, H.
2-3- پیشینۀ ت برای فهم بهتر و نگاه کلی به سوگیریهای ذهنی که تابهحال پژوهشگران مختلف ارائه کردهاند، در جدول زیر به جمعبندی مطالب و نتایج سایر پژوهشها پرداخته ش جدول 1: انواع سوگیریها در پژوهشه ه {مراجعه شود به فایل جدول Aigbovo & Ilaboya Grinbllate & Han Rockenback Razek بهطور کلی، عمدۀ مواردی که در پژوهشهای گوناگون، بارها به آن اشاره شده و بررسی شدهاند، در جدول بالا به آن اشاره شده است.