چکیده:
Corruption, as one of the unfavorable realities of modern society, has experienced unprecedented growth in the administrative, political, and social systems of the world. As recent events have shown, no country, regardless of its wealth and power, can claim to be completely immune to the destructive consequences of corruption. Corruption has various types, including financial, ethical, political, and administrative corruption, which are among the most important. Administrative corruption, resulting from bureaucratic factors, is a product of an inefficient administrative system, negative bureaucracy, ineffective management system, and lack of a meritocratic system. Various solutions have been proposed to combat corruption. This article attempts, with a novel approach, to analyze the root of administrative corruption beyond formal and small factors and to address the issue with a macro and comprehensive view. In this regard, it analyzes the relationship between corruption and the pattern of governance and emphasizes that corruption is affected by the type of relationship between the government and other sectors and its role, position, and specific function in society. Accordingly, it introduces the pattern of good governance as a new pattern to reduce corruption and increase administrative integrity and explains the relationship between the aforementioned pattern and administrative corruption.
خلاصه ماشینی:
66) identified revolutionary and wartime conditions, the reconstruction period, the inefficiency of oversight bodies, the lack of proper performance of civil society institutions in monitoring the performance of the administrative system, the absence of a performance evaluation system, the lack of a management control system, the inadequacy of administrative methods and procedures, their obsolescence, the ambiguity of laws and regulations, the inefficiency of administrative structures, excessive government intervention in economic affairs, and state monopolies coupled with weak governance as factors that prepared the ground for a small group of citizens to exploit specific rents and gain vast wealth, thereby expanding corruption.
Thomas Table 2: Factors Influencing Administrative Corruption and Methods to Combat It (Source: Farokhseresht, 1383) By accepting the four dimensions mentioned above – economic, cultural, managerial, and political – and the impact of factors, components, and indicators contained in each of them on administrative corruption, and also expanding on each of the aforementioned components in Table 2, the author believes that a comprehensive and systematic approach to address each of these factors across the four dimensions lies within the model of good governance.
In another definition that emphasizes the political nature and managerial aspects of governance, governance is defined as the use of political authority and the exercise of control over society and the management of resources for social and economic development (Ronald Johnson[2], 1990).
Based on this definition, the following indicators are defined for good governance: rule of law, accountability, effective management, access to information (information society).
(
, 
, 
)
