چکیده:
The aim of this research is to explain the relationship between literary theory and criticism and comparative literature, as well as to examine the challenges and capacities of this relationship. First, the reasons for the existence of a close relationship between these two fields are examined. Then, the use of non-native (foreign) theories for reading native cultural products is proposed as a solution in literary and comparative literature research. Additionally, the importance and necessity of such an approach in the field of comparative literature are mentioned. After six decades, there is still talk of a 'crisis in comparative literature.' The emergence of the crisis initially stemmed from the relationship between comparative literature and literary theory and criticism. The interdependence of these two is not only due to their similarities in definition but also due to their shared importance, necessity, goals, and ideals. The continuation of the crisis in comparative literature in a new form (identity crisis) is also a result of changes in the status of literary theory and criticism at the level of scientific and academic assemblies. Despite this and the (justified) complaint in comparative literature regarding the application of foreign theories to read native works, constructive and conscious interaction between these two fields can create new capacities in literary research. Such interaction will guarantee the growth and diversity of both fields.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Then, the use of non-native (foreign) theories for reading native cultural products is proposed as a strategy in literary research and comparative literature.
The continuation of the crisis in comparative literature in a new form (identity crisis) is also a result of changes in the status of literary theory and criticism at the level of scientific and academic communities.
Despite these issues and the (justified) complaints in comparative literature regarding the application of foreign theories to read native works, a constructive and conscious interaction between these two fields can create new capacities in literary research.
Introduction The subject of the present research is to clarify the relationship between the two fields of literary criticism and theory and comparative literature, as well as to examine the challenges and capacities of this relationship.
Furthermore, the use of non-native literary theories in reading and understanding native cultural works is proposed as a new strategy in comparative literature research.
What is the origin and the reasons for the close relationship between the two fields of comparative literature and literary theory and criticism?
Rene Wellek, one of the pioneers of new criticism and author of one of the first histories of literary criticism, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Edward Said 20, Judith Butler 21, Jonathan Culler 22, Douman 23, Araceli Heerz, 24 and Jean-Michel Rabeau 25 are all of this kind.
Such an approach can be a strategy for constructive interaction between comparative literature and literary theory and criticism in the field of Persian literature research.
(
, 
, 
)
